On October 9th, a gunman stopped a
school bus on a road in Mingora, Swat Valley. He identified14-years-old Malala Yousefzai
and shot
her in the head.
Fighting for her life, Ms. Yousefzai has emerged
as the symbol for women rights, education and empowerment in a society that has
long been a subject of debate all over the world. The incident has generated a
lot of controversy in many circles.
Malala Yousefzai was
airlifted to Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham on 15th
October. There is a chance that she would survive the injuries and return to Pakistan
after extensive recover and rehabilitation.
Malala Yousefzai was just another girl in a
region where being a women is an unforgivable crime. She wanted to become
educated, another sin in the eyes of eth tribal law. However, her most damning
crime was her outspokenness.
Supported by her father, Ziauddin Yousefzai,
she wrote a series of blogs on the BBC‘s website in 2009. This blog was titled “Diary of a Pakistani Schoolgirl”
became an instant hit on the internet. It is a raw depiction of the troubles that
people faced during the height of the Taliban insurgency.
Reading through it, one passage stands out and
pretty much sums up the feelings of the child. The last entry reads:” I had a terrible dream yesterday with
military helicopters and the Taleban. I have had such dreams since the launch
of the military operation in Swat. My mother made me breakfast and I went off
to school. I was afraid going to school because the Taleban had issued an edict
banning all girls from attending schools.”
True to their usual self, power players and
political actors have seized the opportunity to gain some political mileage out
of the incident. Every politician has issued statements that cover the entire spectrum
of the issue of Taliban insurgency.
While everyone condemns the incident, the
debate on why it happened and what should be done about it is rapidly turning
into a political sinkhole. Everyone is hunting for a scapegoat to blame and
then crucify publically.
Liberals are foaming at the mouth and the conservatives
are retaliating with their denouncement of NATO, the US and their personal favorite,
the drone attacks. There are factions within these two groups that do not agree
on a formula of allocating the blame.
Conservatives and religious elements have an
easier time in this matter. Their stance is that Malala
Yousefzai was shot because of drone attacks in the tribal areas of Pakistan.
For them, this shooting of a school girl is a watershed that could result in the
suspension and eventually termination of the attacks.
For liberals, it is a tough nut to crack for
two reasons. The most immediate problem is how to turn this incident into a
movement of harnessing the ‘rouge’ elements within the security establishment
of Pakistan. In the longer run, the
liberals have the problem of justifying the allegations from the religionists.
Malala Yousefzai has the dubious honor of
rocking the country twice.
The first time was when her words showed the world
the true face of the Taliban insurgency. The second time is crueler. Her misery
is being used as an advertisement by both sides.
Will Malala ever able to write another blog and
clarify her position?
Nice post...and very well written too!
ReplyDeleteThank you Faisal Arshad
Delete